Today's lifestyle has experienced a dramatical change compared to the past days. This change affected young people's lives as well. Some argue that youngsters are more inclined towards their community, and they are helping society to a great extent. While others hold the different idea that some young have developed a different attitude which prevents them to be a part of the society. From my perspective, the formal view carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
Primarily, today, the scenario has been changed and people are more likely to take participate in the community work. Parents and school system play a vital role and they are trying to make children understand that value of taking part in the community in order to make our society strong. To elaborate this more, most of the schools in my town have started arranging community campaigns as a part of the student's education and students actively participate in such social works. Hence, students would learn the importance of social work from their childhood compared to the early days. Schools also have been encouraging their parents to volunteer with the children. Thus, it will be a more effective way to create awareness among all the members in the community.
Furthermore, with the advancement of technology, teenagers have become more matured and they think independently today than earlier. In the past time, children were not allowed to act or think differently without their parent's permission. My own life is a compelling example of this. I and my friends have made a small independent social group on Facebook to collect the fund for the homeless animals. Our group helps them to provide a shelter where they can live freely. Initially, there were only five members who have started this fundraising group on social media, and now, there are more than a thousand people who are actively participating in this group. Hence, we cannot expect this type of work from people in the past days.
Admittedly, I agree with the notion that there are few young people who do not have an interest in this type of community work. They spend several hours of a day in scrolling their Instagram account, but they rarely try to know about the surrounding activities which are taking place in the community. One of the leading factors is the freedom which has been given by the parents. For instance, there are some youngsters who have developed bad habits and they always prefer to spend their time with their friends. As a result, they do not have time to serve their duties towards the community. Hence, they never feel that they are a part of the community, and they may feel apart from the other people in society.
All in all, I strongly believe that I agree that few teenagers are trying to runaways from their duties but the majority of the young people who would like to participate in the social work. This is because the technology, schools, and parents are constantly supporting them. I hope, in the future, the entire community would take part in the community work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... are helping society to a great extent. While others hold the different idea that som...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ng community campaigns as a part of the students education and students actively partici...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ndependently today than earlier. In the past time, children were not allowed to act or th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2562.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 523.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89866156788 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56144792416 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466539196941 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 803.7 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7451363745 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6785714286 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115301891658 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352993549903 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408176586718 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07059354778 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327511334557 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.