TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It is well known during the history of humanity that younger generations are the valuable treasures of every society. History has witnessed plenty of young heroes or groups who were capable of bringing dramatic changes to an entire nation's life. Although many people might believe that the new young generation has a different attitude toward the community and plays a faint role in the society's life in comparison to the youngsters in the past, I would argue that young people are still one of the significant driving powers in the community.

Firstly, young people have more energy and incentives in comparison to the older people. It would definitely be quite difficult for an older person who is involved in his own career and has many responsibilities to be active in helping the community as much as younger people are. For instance, as I was in college, I was part of a group of young students named "Helpers"! We were seeking to find students from poor families in deprived areas who needed help for their school assignments. The task of the group members was to find at least five students per semester and teach them every school course they needed. It was a huge amount of work to identify students, talk to their parents and teach a variety of high school courses, but were able to keep on with it only since we were energetic and enthusiastic in what we were doing.

Furthermore, young people mostly have an idealist perspective and living in a perfect society is a part of their target. They are ambitious to have their own specific definition of the society. For example, as a young person, I really believe that I have the responsibility to help those who need my help. For instance, the core idea in our college group for teaching poor children was to fight many problems in the roots. To help a child find and develop his/ her real potentials and to stop him/her being deprived of education for financial reasons. Teaching was what we were good at and we were looking at it as a responsibility to help our community develop and become a better place to live.

Finally, compared to older generations, young people connect to a wider range of social networks. In addition, modern technology, such as social networks has created a new type of media for mostly younger people to demonstrate their ideas and make positive contributions. Helping community is not limited anymore. Different internet campaigns prove that young generations are trying to be effective in their societies in their own ways! For instance, we had an internet website and a Facebook page to introduce our group and attract other students to become a member or donate money, books etc. Indeed, the broad network of our friends in the real world and on the internet helped us to raise money, help more children, and be more effective in our community.

To sum up, based on the arguments explored above and my personal experience, I believe that since young people are usually more active and energetic, have more idealistic points of view about life and connect to a variety of people, make a significant contribution to their communities’ progress and development.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... bringing dramatic changes to an entire nations life. Although many people might believ...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, really, so, still, thus, well, as to, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2643.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 540.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89444444444 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82843379327 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.9 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.4345116413 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.15 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121725984554 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433439867632 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0230491377887 0.0737576698707 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726426271341 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178171498793 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.