The recognition of debate leads us to discuss that whether young people nowadays spend much time on helping communities. Indeed, young people have variety of methods to socialization. There are some reasons to explain.
First, most of the teenagers are willing to develop their socialization on the Internet. As the advance of technology nowadays, teenagers are exposure to the information of world. All kinds of social medias allow them to make a connection with people who may come from other side of the world. Then, it is evitable for teenagers nowadays to maintain the relationship with their communities. Meanwhile, some convenient services offered as applications on phone solve much problems. Such as, if teenagers get hungry on the home, they just make an order about food on phone, and they choose what kinds of food they want. If they want to buy something, they don't need to go out to take a long distance, but they just shop online. Therefore, the efficiency of information world blocks teenagers to have more connections with their communities.
Second, teenagers are bombed by multitasks nowadays. In order to form a promising future for young people, they do many extra things than teenagers in the past. Teenagers are under stressful condition nowadays. They have no choice to do something making them more competitive than others. Such as, most of them attend to science projects on campus to sharpen their skills and broaden their knowledge on science. And if teenagers' interests focus on art, and they spend extra time, likes weekend, to attend art courses, such as piano class. As a result, teenagers care about themselves and don't have enough time to care about their communities.
In conclusion, young people nowadays don't have enough chance to meet their communities, because the young either stay in the home or develop their ability outside.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the teenagers') or simply say ''most teenagers''.
Suggestion: most of the teenagers; most teenagers
...re are some reasons to explain. First, most of teenagers are willing to develop their socializat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 462, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... offered as applications on phone solve much problems. Such as, if teenagers get hun...
^^^^
Line 2, column 651, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nt. If they want to buy something, they dont need to go out to take a long distance,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teenagers
...xtra things than teenagers in the past. teenagers are under stressful condition nowadays....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lt, teenagers care about themselves and dont have enough time to care about their co...
^^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... In conclusion, young people nowadays dont have enough chance to meet their commun...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13442622951 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75977167418 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560655737705 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5231964013 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4210526316 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0526315789 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180969550953 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589966898556 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542168193189 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138024263184 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478978901651 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.