The set of material focus on the debate over explanation about whether the portrait on sale is about Jane Austen. And the author proposes three possible theories but the speak retorts them one by one.
First, the passage says that Austen’s family recognized it as a portrait of the author after Austen’s death. Nevertheless, the speaker argue that Austen already had passed away for a long time, all of member in the family didn’t see the Austen’s face actually. Therefore, the first of idea in essay is rebutted.
Second, the writer demonstrates that the sketch of teenage girl in the painting is similar with that of Austen’s face. However, the lecturer indicates that the family of Austen is very large, and some relatives of Austen have similar feature with Austen, such as face.
Third, the author says that style of the painting links it to Humphrey, and there is much possibility that Humphrey was hired into Austen family to paint. While, the speak retorts that the canvas in painting panel was serviced by a man who actually didn’t service the canvas in London when Austen was a teenager. When the man service the canvas, Austen was already 27 years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...or proposes three possible theories but the speak retorts them one by one. First, the pa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...red into Austen family to paint. While, the speak retorts that the canvas in painting pan...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64262946848 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572139303483 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7318989981 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506444353697 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206307491064 0.0996497079465 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107941050458 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298285436426 0.162205337803 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078636855716 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.