A simple recognition of the argument leads our discussion to controversial issue about whether students are supposed to take broaden subjects rather than to specialize in one specific subject. Some individuals argue that specific subject allow students sharpen their professional knowledge. By contrast, from my perspective, taking broaden subjects is essential for students to go further in the future.
To begin with, broaden knowledge allow students to form all-round development. The variety of knowledge is related to innovation. Broaden knowledge facilitates students to fulfill their own knowledge system, which is the bedrock of innovation. It is verified by process of solving problems in science. There are many kinds of interdiscipline, such as remote sensing, it consists of optics and electromagnetism to take pictures about land from outer space. By contrast, if scientists focus on optics all the time, they can’t increase the resolution about remote sense pictures. With the basis of electromagnetism, they can find a band for increasing quality of pictures. Besides, broaden knowledge causes students to finish work efficiently in the future. Before extensive application of computer, all of data in research cost much time of scientists to analyze. Nowadays, there are variety of application in the Internet having strong ability to handle with data just in few of second. It is beneficial for students to learn this kind of knowledge.
Furthermore, broaden knowledge is the basis for course in college. For high school students, most of them study diligently to apply for a university with high reputation or high academic ability. All of knowledge learned in high school are directly related with those in college. Such as, in order to absorb math’s knowledge as possible as you can in college, you are suggested with firm fundamental knowledge system about math, which is available in high school.
In conclusion, broaden knowledge of academic subjects not only benefits students’ further education, but also foster students to be all-round people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, second, so, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53125 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09838037328 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3097425725 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1578947368 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159887289242 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049209235787 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453924552126 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105037308217 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461942919981 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.