Tpo 25
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
There has been much discussion around the topic of whether young people nowadays give enough time to helping society or not. One group of people believe that young people spend more of their time to help the society. On the other hand, others assert that they are spend less time than on the past. According to my own experience and actual observation about actual life have led me to be agree with this topic. I have many reason to prove my point.
The first and foremost consequential reason is that over the last few decade technology has had great influence in young people’s lives. they spend more of their time in the university and schools and spend rest of their time front of computer and surfer in the web. invented the smart phone with their interesting opportunity’s encourage young people that spend a lot of their time with their phones and excessive use of technology devises make sense of competition among companies to invent new thing to attract the attention of youth.
Another point that springing to my mind is that, young people have big dreams and want to be successful in their future life and create their future work life with education. technology development opening the new door in education and student try to adopt themselves with this change. they must try hard and gain a lot of information about different field because of that they spend most of their time in the university and libraries. they know, if work hard and specialize in their field have opportunity to have good job with good income.
To sum it all up by taking all the details in the consideration, young people spend less time to help their society because of development in technology and planning about their future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...other hand, others assert that they are spend less time than on the past. According t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
... me to be agree with this topic. I have many reason to prove my point. The first and for...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...influence in young people's lives. they spend more of their time in the univers...
^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Invented
...ront of computer and surfer in the web. invented the smart phone with their interesting ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Technology
... their future work life with education. technology development opening the new door in edu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...y to adopt themselves with this change. they must try hard and gain a lot of informa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...r time in the university and libraries. they know, if work hard and specialize in th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8288590604 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58654313634 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520134228188 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8065127374 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.692307692 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46153846154 5.45110844103 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260981448873 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101386623116 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962161544041 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175097909288 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562863736471 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.