Apparently, there has been a historical debate about the reality of reaching the North pole by Robert e beary .
In thıs set of materıals the readıng passage talk about possible reasons that show robert E peary reach the north pole, and the listening passage argue about that, robert E peary cant reach north pole, and the evidence cand proof this claim.
The reading section explain about, robert E peary that was awell-khnow adeventurer and arctic explorer who claimed to have reached the north pole, and though some historians have expressed doubt that peary did in fact reach the north pole,three argument provide strong support for the truth of Peary claim. first, the nation geographic society according to evidence and equipment they belief that Peary indeed reach the north.secound, according to evidence Peary used the dogsled and this make it possible to travel in about 37 day. third, Peary when reach north took photo and in the photo according to place of sun they accepted that Peary reach the north pole.
The listening section explain that, there aren’t solid evident to shove Peary reach the north, reading section not convinciving because of some reasons. first the committee combined by peary’s friend and they can’d examind records and equipment carefully addition the sun place in the picture can’t improve any thing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (peary) must be used with a third-person verb: 'reaches'.
Suggestion: reaches
...ssible reasons that show robert E peary reach the north pole, and the listening passa...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...assage argue about that, robert E peary cant reach north pole, and the evidence cand...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the evidence cand proof this claim. The reading section explain about, rober...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , three
...t peary did in fact reach the north pole,three argument provide strong support for the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...g support for the truth of Peary claim. first, the nation geographic society accordin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: BELIEF_BELIEVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'believe' (verb) instead of belief (noun)?
Suggestion: believe
...ccording to evidence and equipment they belief that Peary indeed reach the north.secou...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 534, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
... it possible to travel in about 37 day. third, Peary when reach north took photo and ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted that Peary reach the north pole. The listening section explain that, ther...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Peary) must be used with a third-person verb: 'reaches'.
Suggestion: reaches
...ren't solid evident to shove Peary reach the north, reading section not convinci...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...t convinciving because of some reasons. first the committee combined by peary's ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...place in the picture can't improve any thing.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, third, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.315 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42688586464 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7463946884 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.166666667 110.228320801 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3333333333 21.698381199 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23993385003 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13797632112 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093758366184 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182861352026 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102583551351 0.0443174109184 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.3589403974 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.