TPO 22
In the set of materials the reading passage argue about some reason that use of ethanol not good replacement for gasoline and explain some reason to prove their assumption and the listening passage argue about some extra information about same issue that show this replacement is very good method.
The reading passage argue about ethanol fuel that made from plants that used instead gasoline and notice some reasons that show the ethanol not good replacement with gasoline. First and foremost, ethanol can’t solve the Problems that caused by gasoline use like global warming, because ethanol when burned release carbon that help trap heat in atmosphere and second, and produce a lot of amount of ethanol can reduce the food for animals that feed them. third, the ethanol doesn’t have any economical advantage to the government and if government stop helping to produce the ethanol, the price of it increase dramatically.
The listening passage completely reject the content of the reading. According the listening passage, carbon don’t trap in the atmosphere, but the a large amount of carbon consume with plants. The plants remove the carbon in environment. second the animals feed the animals but don’t feed the part of the animals that have cellolose and the ethanol made from part of the plant that have cellolose, so this process doesn’t decrease the food of farm animals. third, the increase in use of ethanol cause to increase in production and that’s led to drop price, so ethanol can be very economical than gasoline.
To sum it all up by taking all the detail in the consideration the reading passage argue about the disadvantage of use of ethanol and listening passage in contrast with reading g passage and talk about advantage of the ethanol fuel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the listening passage argue about some extra information about same issue that ...
^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of amounts'.
Suggestion: a lot of amounts
...t in atmosphere and second, and produce a lot of amount of ethanol can reduce the food for anim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...ce the food for animals that feed them. third, the ethanol doesn't have any econ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
... don't trap in the atmosphere, but the a large amount of carbon consume with pla...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...lants remove the carbon in environment. second the animals feed the animals but don&ap...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...os;t decrease the food of farm animals. third, the increase in use of ethanol cause t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14675767918 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63458238754 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453924914676 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.1928301034 49.2860985944 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.8 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437220353055 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187477449877 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121291839256 0.0662205650399 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27324224663 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148154469117 0.0443174109184 334% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.