TPO 29- agree or not. to improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Satisfying the employees finanicially has always been considered as one of the most critical motivations improving the efficiency of organizations. In this context, there are mutually exclusive notions regarding whether raising the salaries of the educators will influence the universities positively or not. In my point of view, I agree that this will have a direct positive impact on the knowledge-based institues in spite of the fact that others may think differently. My answer to this convoluted bone of contention in twofold, and in the following, the rationale behind it will be elaborated by the most outstanding, solid proofs.
The first and foremost reason which is worth mentioning is that teachers will be more eager to try their best in their positions. I have seen many professors who would not even lift their fingers, mainly because they were not satisfied with their incomes. Researchers at RMIT school, one of the best universities of Australia, conducted a survey of their professors by disseminating a questionnaire among them. They realized that there is a direct exponential relation between their salary and the scientific outputs of their scholars. In other words, the more salary they got, the more effort they gave to their researches. To put it into a more vivid picture, my own supervisor, Dr Khanzadi, did not want to help me finishing my thesis; he even barely knew my name. Once, he told me:" I do not have to work in an institute which does not even support my loans, so I have other responsibilities in other organizations which are more profitable for me".
The second and equally far-reaching explanation is that motivated lecturers can use their salaries to attend to numerous conferences related to their works. Moreover, this money will give them the opportunity to stregthen their relationshipss with the industry which is both vital for their universities and students. As an illustration, my friend, Ali, was a civil engineering senior lecturer in PNU university in Kerman, but his salary was not enough to cover the expenses of traveling to other provinces to attend congresses. Therefore, he decided to change his institute to a new one which offered him a preponderance amount of money. Afterwards, he was easily able to go to other places to attend to conferences. More interestingly, he had the opportunity to visit diverse factories related to his research - creating economical self-consolidated concrete - and made many beneficial colleagues who helped him obtain grants for his university. Now, he both teaches in school and works part time as the advisor of three cement manufacturing companies and batching plants (a tool for making concrete in huge volums).
In conclusion, taking all the aforementioned rationalizations and examples into account, I believe that raising the salaries of the professors will benefit both the human resources and the universities themselves although there are some exceptions which are excluded from the general rule. to recapitulate my opinions, this approach not only motivates the teachers to work as hard as they can but also gives them the opportunity to attend to myriad conferences and visit diverse factories in order to fortify their relations with the industry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | subashdevkota | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | Maryam Madson | 73 | view |
- explanations about TLP 83
- powered flight by ptesaurs 81
- TPO 15 independent agree or not in order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age 73
- TPO 17 integrated the population of birds is decreasing because of three reasons human populations are expanding agricultural activities are increasing the usage of chemical pesticides are increasing 80
- TPO 12 independent focusing on one thing is better than knowing basic things about diverse majors 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to finish' or 'finish'.
Suggestion: to finish; finish
...r, Dr Khanzadi, did not want to help me finishing my thesis; he even barely knew my name....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 990, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ow, he both teaches in school and works part time as the advisor of three cement manufac...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1014, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chool and works part time as the advisor of three cement manufacturing companies ...
^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ich are excluded from the general rule. to recapitulate my opinions, this approach...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2749.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 522.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2662835249 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17278381938 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549808429119 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 875.7 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1457720638 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.45 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168221788387 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510188428639 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422296306635 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986193851406 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168317319282 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 86.8835125448 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.