For years, in order to compete for more government financial support and greater social recognition, universities have been making efforts to boost their status among the public. Undoubtedly, a as part of the competition, a fierce fight for renowned scientists and researchers is constantly ongoing. Therefore, it is common that universities are spending more money raising their employees’ income and promoting the level of education. In my opinion, such practice makes sense and is even very necessary.
Universities play an important role in exploring novel knowledge and creating new generations of great minds for the society, either of which unquestionably is supposed to be fulfilled by professors whose responsibilities are conducting research on frontier areas and educating prospective scientists, engineers, doctors, etc. With a more sufficient funding for hiring teaching staff, universities will be able to recruit top-level talents as their faculty members. Thus, the most up-to-date knowledge can be passed on to the university students through the lectures of elite scholars. On the other hand, due to the rich rewards, professors will be more motivated and dedicated to distribute larger amount of time and energy for delivering knowledge and expertise. Constant refinement of teaching methodology and content is possible, which guarantees that their quality of teaching keeps pace with the time.
In addition, a well-known reputation of paying great attention to education could be a core asset for universities. A survey suggests that nearly 90% of all students relate the quality of education the most closely to future career opportunities or pursuit of a higher degree. Attempts to build up a positive image like this will naturally attract many talented students and lead to an increase in revenue derived from tuition.
However, if such remuneration is unconditionally provided, it may be likely that professors would take such generous treatment for granted, compromising their initiative and motivation to improve the quality of instructing students. Fortunately, several measures can be taken to balance out the undesirable effects. For example, student assessment and more detailed rating criteria could be introduced to make sure professors’ teaching practice would be evaluated. Moreover, punishment for those who fail to meet the requirements could also be implemented.
To sum up, a better quality of education is what everyone longs for as it has been a common belief that universities, professors and students involved will all benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r status among the public. Undoubtedly, a as part of the competition, a fierce fi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63333333333 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17529603832 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617948717949 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4017822167 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.235294118 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194947218401 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611446150917 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431037914745 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105944426734 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397435308803 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 58.1214874552 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.01818996416 130% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.