In order to boost the quality of education, it is definitely important for the school to raise the salaries of university professors. If university spends money on famous professors, it will allow more students to register and also create a good image to the companies.Therefore, I highly recommend that colleges should spend money on professors to improve the quality of education.
To begin with, a university needs a good reputation to attract more students and it is beneficial to spend money on hiring well-known lecturers. Besides, it also creates a high quality of education that allows students to learn more professional knowledge. To be more specific, students can gain more strength if they follow particular professor and do the research which earns a prize in their major field. The university will also acquire more reputation since their students get a great accomplishment. Therefore, hiring professors is an essential way to build a positive reputation and improve the education.
On the other hand, it seems that university needs to spend more money on the prestigious teachers. However, that is not true, when the university makes an investment on teachers, it will get a huge revenue from students. Because parents care about their children's future, parents will send their children to the college which has plenty resources for their children to study. Furthermore, the profit will beyond the investment that the college can make more money. Therefore, spending money on teachers not only can improve the education but also make more money.
To sum up, to boost the quality of education, it is important to take both students and reputation into consideration. That is, the university needs to spend money on professors to attract more students and make the university more competitive than other schools.
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: the 90
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 81
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 3
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
...so create a good image to the companies.Therefore, I highly recommend that colleges shoul...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 293.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2662116041 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00802856635 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474402730375 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0575190702 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208565558429 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890750154929 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064546260492 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16032121143 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728070055473 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.