Universities are the vehicle, which provide the deeper knowledge about enormous topics and engage the students in their field of interest. Not surprisingly, it is a controversial question, whether educational institutes increase the budget for mentors’ salaries or not. In my opinion, it is necessary to spend money on the professor’s wage. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, with the advent of modern technology, inflation has increased at the rapid pace, because of that societal expenditures become double from the past decades. If we want a high standard education from well qualified person, we need to pay them according to their qualification. My own experience is a compelling example of this. After passing high school, I chose a university which was near to my house, in order to do further studies, but I found that school staff had not hold extensive knowledge about particular subjects and had not conduct research projects. Because most of the educators were graduated and was doing part-time jobs and intellectual professors needed high salary, so they were not appointed here. However, my friends from the other university send me plentiful topics to write about their research project, which really made me worried. Finally, I transferred myself to other university, even though it was far from my area, but I got opportunity to upgrade my knowledge.
Secondly, when professionals are not fully paid, they look around for the other sources to earn money. As I mentioned in the above paragraph that financially security play a key role in today’s world. For instance, some teachers start taking extra-classes at their home and they do not pay fully attention in the class. My cousin's experience is an evidence of what i mean. he is studying in a business class and his professor has already mentioned that they all need tuition classes which he runs at his home. If they will not do so, it can considerably affect their annual grades. In such a scenario, schools are blamed for providing low quality education and fragile future to the youngsters. On the other hand, If his school mentors are paid with high wages, they would not done the things which cause bad impact at the students mind at the broaden scale.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that paying low salaries to the professors decline the quality of the education and also shows no respect for work ethics and it is a dangerous approach to teach the kids in a such environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'held'.
Suggestion: held
..., but I found that school staff had not hold extensive knowledge about particular su...
^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'conducted'.
Suggestion: conducted
...e about particular subjects and had not conduct research projects. Because most of the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...usins experience is an evidence of what i mean. he is studying in a business clas...
^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...perience is an evidence of what i mean. he is studying in a business class and his...
^^
Line 5, column 846, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ause bad impact at the students mind at the broaden scale. In conclusion, I strongly bel...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i feel, i mean, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02127659574 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.894088251 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9625111693 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0875871912166 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.026470753346 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203964799855 0.0737576698707 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549006471669 0.150856017488 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193764056523 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.