tpo 31
With the advent of technology, life style change. people are more deal with technology in compare with past. This event has a lot of effect on people's life which some of them is helpful but some of them are distractive. Although some people believes that because of the changing which is occur quickly, people are less happy or less satisfied with their lives, I think living now is more attractive than the past because of the reasons which will be discussed in details below.
The first and the most reason is that, people who lives now are deal with more changes which is helps them to experience more. However, people who lives in the past didn't see a lot of changes so they were had less exiting life. To be more specific, people which are deal with more changes experience more thing that is so helpful for their life. So modern people have better life in compare with the past. For instance, now we have cars which are update every years and we can use better car every year and this situation that let use to experience the modernest car every year.
The second reason is that, changing always makes difference which is make hope in people life. In fact, people who lives in the past has not hope as much as modern people. More over, now we are always waiting for a change and we want to see the changes. There is a scycologic fact that, people who are waiting for new things have more hope for living so they are much happier.
In conclusion, I completely believe that modern people who are deal with more changes are much happier and more satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. because people who lives now have not only exiting life and experience more than the past people, but also they are more hopeful in their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...dvent of technology, life style change. people are more deal with technology in compar...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'occurred'.
Suggestion: occurred
...s that because of the changing which is occur quickly, people are less happy or less ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
.... However, people who lives in the past didnt see a lot of changes so they were had l...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 531, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... every year and this situation that let use to experience the modernest car every y...
^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'hoped'.
Suggestion: hoped
...t, people who lives in the past has not hope as much as modern people. More over, no...
^^^^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...I completely believe that modern people who are deal with more changes are much happier...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...eir lives than people were in the past. because people who lives now have not only exit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50156739812 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09610301778 2.67179642975 78% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401253918495 0.524837075471 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4631510893 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7333333333 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 86.8835125448 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.