tpo 29
Both the reading and the lecture try to discuss about dinosaurs which are live in Alaska's North slope that is too cold. Although the reading claims that they migrated during winter, the lecture repudiates and presents that they didn't migrate because of some reasons.
At first, the reading declares that, Edmontosaurs should migrated because there were too cold and dark for finding food so they were forced to migrate to find food supply. However, the lecture states that, there were warmer than today. She also mentiones there were creating good condition for growing vegitation because in summer there were 24 sun light.
Second the reading present that, many edmontosaur skeletones have been uneathed from the same site. The lecture, on the other hand, mentiones that, they live for other reasons. Also she examples some kinds of planet.
Finally, the reading passage presents that, edmonosaurs had physical ability to migrating long distance because they were really fast. But the lecture states that, young edmonosaurs were not physically capable of migrationg. So it cannot be a good reason to support they migration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...cture repudiates and presents that they didnt migrate because of some reasons. At fi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ones that, they live for other reasons. Also she examples some kinds of planet. Fin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, really, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 180.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33595091273 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0198084893 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3636363636 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236493511824 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891707358477 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710083097226 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14738535233 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328110890488 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.