Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Now-a-days teaching is too hard because children have a lot of hobby in compare with the past. Also technology improved and some children prefer to study their lessons by themselves. Although some people believe that teachers are appreciated and valued by society as much as the past, I think they are not because of the reasons which will be discussed in detail bellow.
The first and the most reason is that, technology improved so, children can learn everything with technology instead of their teachers. To be more specific, now everyone can use internet and read everything they want. However, in the past everyone should learn from their teachers because of absents of technology. For instance, Now I can learn English by using some apps like memrise and learn new vocabulary which I need to improve my English language. Additionally, as I mentioned before, some children are more interested in study at home.
The second reason is that people has some respect for teachers in the past because of their culture. Nevertheless, now everyone looks every job same as each other. Moreover, teachers do a lot of voluntary works in the past which some of them do not now. In fact, people who work voluntary in a society are always respectfully. So, now it is not matter what job you have it is important to be a helpful person in a society.
In conclusion, I completely agree about the fact that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Because, in the past, not only people has not access to internet which is now useful to learn, but also, teachers do voluntary stuff in the past, so they were lovely for others in a society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hobby seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of hobbies'.
Suggestion: a lot of hobbies
...ching is too hard because children have a lot of hobby in compare with the past. Also technolo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... lot of hobby in compare with the past. Also technology improved and some children p...
^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'accessed'.
Suggestion: accessed
...e, in the past, not only people has not access to internet which is now useful to lear...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 291.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77663230241 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62337318939 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0348378318 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249854895559 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090545663327 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115756967871 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178418628082 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123842718291 0.0645574589148 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.