As Mahatma Gandhi said, the future depends on what we do in the present. In my point of view, nowadays young people have more influence on the necessary decisions than old people, and what they do directly affects the future. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, young people are at the heart of our society and future. They study more, they obtain more knowledge than old people. Youngsters are always important, but they begin to play a more necessary role when they become experts in their field. As young people develop, society, government, and the most important, future flourish. Thus, it is important to include young people in the process of making decisions about everything. For example, I have a friend who is participating in many organizations. He is only 18 years old and until now he has done many things about youth or children in our country.
Secondly, with the development of the technology, young people become inextricable part of life. Because young people's perception capacity of new technologies is stronger than old people, they influence more people. Take social media platforms, for instance. Social media users are more likely to be young people, so it means that youngsters have more opportunities to influence community. Millions of photos, videos, posts are shared on different social media platforms every day by youngsters. Therefore, young people take part in many vital desicions related to future.
In the summary, I posit that young people have great influence and play major role on the necessary decisions of their society. Finally, we should pay more attention to young people so that they develop because if they develop, our future will be just as beautiful.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 292.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05136986301 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66700358907 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544520547945 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7793328623 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.9444444444 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160717570862 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587004701307 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478995398116 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111780373867 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104277184115 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.