TPO 33, Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
In the schools and universities, the students have some projects to do besides their studies. In these projects, they learn how to solve practical problems, and how to research on a specific subject. The projects can be done in a group or alone. There are some debates about whether it is better to do the school projects in a group or alone. In my way of thinking the students learn much more if they do the projects in a group because not only do they can share more ideas, but also they will be able to cover more area.
The first reason which should be stated here is that more people mean more opinion minds. Each student has their own particular idea which is not necessarily similar to others. Some ideas may have some benefits which cannot be found in others. Therefore, gathering various ideas will result in a solid and complete solution, so if the students work in a group they can share their own idea to solve the problems of the project better, while it will not be gained when they work alone. In addition, if people explain an issue for others they will get a deep understanding on that issue. While talking about their idea and the issues in the project, the students understanding will increase, this helps them to have a comprehensive knowledge of the issue.
The other point which deserves some words here is that doing a project in a group makes it more comprehensive. In groups, the members divide duties between individuals, each person tries to do their part perfectly, and each duty may be different from others. After combining the different works, the result will be more expanded, and the project will be done better which increase the student's knowledge. However, by working alone, the person cannot cover a vast area, even they if want to do cover whole the project, it takes them a long time and tired, then they could not do their job perfectly and cannot learn as much as when working in groups.
To summarize, it is better to assign group projects in the class, in this way students learn much more rather than working alone. In a group they share many different viewpoints, talk about the project to each other, they can cover more area of studies by dividing duties; All of these lead to better understanding and learning.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.70
- TPO 40.Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?60
- TPO 28. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.60
- TPO 283
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... will be done better which increase the students knowledge. However, by working alone, t...
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT
Message: Use simply 'many'.
...an working alone. In a group they share many different viewpoints, talk about the project to e...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65586034913 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44637768473 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448877805486 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0165571173 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.823529412 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281968862918 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101492298444 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725816037185 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199418740336 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203256339982 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.