When it comes to working projects, people in general believe that teamwork helps students to learn communication and cooperation with other people. On the other hand, quite a few people argue that they prefer working alone since it is challenging to meet agreement in the whole group. Although working alone apparently exhibits personal efforts, students actually learn much more effectively by working with others.
Certainly, group members may receive the same score of group project even though one of them contributes much less than others. However, the benefits still outweigh the drawbacks. By comparing with contribution, students realize that teammates put extra efforts in this project; thus, in order to fit in and not to disappoint others, they choose to work harder. Moreover, by sharing with their notes, they modify their studying style gradually, since they may ignore numerous important points. Also, via group discussion, they see those overlooking details clearly. Hence, the whole group improves together.
Communication and concession are essential social skills and should be equipped by every individual. Since we come from different families and are raised with distinctive values and attitudes, working with other students must encounter countless argument and disagreement while discussing projects. Some may choose to concede with the majority easily without trying to persuade others. On the other hand, some argue until one of the teammate feels furious, which sometimes creates the awkward atmosphere. Therefore, coping with disagreements along with uniting the whole group seems a valuable lessen to learn. As a result, communication and cooperation is crucial in preventing the group from falling apart.
Students gain more from working with others than working alone. They learn positive attitudes toward studying by working together. Also, they learn to communicate and cooperate with other students at the same time. Accordingly, people should not hesitate to choose to work with others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meeting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: meeting
...r working alone since it is challenging to meet agreement in the whole group. Although ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'actually', 'also', 'apparently', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'in general', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204610951009 0.229887763892 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.187319884726 0.158761421928 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0778097982709 0.0866891130778 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0835734870317 0.046263068375 181% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0374639769452 0.0685040099705 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14121037464 0.118717715034 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0605187319885 0.0351676179071 172% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68836686796 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0345821325648 0.0309702414327 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0605187319885 0.0887237588012 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0172910662824 0.0209618222197 82% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00576368876081 0.0139019557991 41% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2022.0 2387.08602151 85% => OK
No of words: 306.0 408.028673835 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.60784313725 5.86048508987 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48200974243 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.444444444444 0.338922669872 131% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.352941176471 0.251872472559 140% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.245098039216 0.174417080927 141% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143790849673 0.112833075102 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68836686796 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591503267974 0.524397521467 113% => OK
Word variations: 65.2083744444 59.2087087015 110% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.1052631579 20.5533526081 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3773928935 48.84282405 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.421052632 120.699889404 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1052631579 20.5533526081 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.644075263715 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 51.399380805 45.7405998639 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.31775700935 1.45489161554 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294115216621 0.300154397459 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0882927076517 0.103427244359 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0650181005878 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.441666838803 0.497263757937 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.104884279634 0.151897553556 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100332065397 0.114077575197 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453652359015 0.0781384742642 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.287702761832 0.336927656856 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0344988080027 0.067059652881 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202348845787 0.210909579961 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309274632007 0.0618886996521 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.