The education system, as we all definitely approve and no one is able to really deny, plays an undeniably crucial role in the every aspect of today's society. One of the most significant area of education is how the student can cooperate with each other to solve the problem. On the one hand some people disagree to participate in a group project. On the other hand, others agree. In my point of view, I completely prefer to take part in a project with other persons because of three principal reasons.
First, in group project every student has unique and valuable opinion about the project. Although the target of one project is to do it as soon as possible, the side result of it, is the knowledge that every person in project can get from doing it. For example, when I attend in high school, we had to prepare a solution to manage water supplies of our city effective. We started to gather information about various type of recent improvement in this area and finally we found a solution that was a combination of current methods. Eventually, our achievement was considered as an outstanding result and got the national prize. This experience taught me that cooperation in project is a vital element.
Second, when student work on the specific part of the project they can save time and have remarkably more proper performance. My own experience is a compelling example. When I was a student in undergraduate in Tehran I had a project in chemistry course. Our professor divide the class to different size groups, some of them had three members and others had four members. After one month that the deadline of project finished, the outcome of larger group was considerably more fascinating due to they had more energy and time to elaborate it. As the result collaboration in one project should be regarded as the most helpful way to save time.
Third, the students in group project regularly argue with each other so they try to do their tasks as complete as other member of their group. When one person works in a group does not like to be known as barrier of the path of doing the project so every person try to accomplish his duties in the most reliable way. On the other hand, when someone work alone he often postpone his jobs and think he is a mere responsible of every thin of project like the final result.
In nutshell, although some oppose, doing project in group have useful results. Not only do students learn more and more in the group project but also they spend less time to get the final goals of project. Furthermore, because of pressure of the group the students will feel their selves responsible for the project and they achieve higher scores in group project. The cooperation in the project should be considered as an important element in every project.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...own experience is a compelling example. When I was a student in undergraduate in Teh...
^^^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'postpones'.
Suggestion: postpones
... hand, when someone work alone he often postpone his jobs and think he is a mere respons...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, really, second, so, third, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70961145194 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58738810819 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472392638037 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0191370427 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9583333333 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.20833333333 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211690722769 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671668851702 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601705181168 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130582748032 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457663549529 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.