When thinking about the issue that youngsters are work more efficiently when teachers assign tasks on which students must work as a group than they were required to work alone on projects, varied individuals will have diverse ideas. Some citizens claim that it is better for children to work alone since they may plagiarize others' achievement when work together. However, from where I stand, working as a group may be more suitable for students to enhance their working efficiency, because they can learn far more skills and expertise from other group members and the competition among kids will inspire them to study harder.
First and foremost, team work is conducive to youngsters for they can realize the defects of themselves and acquire many merits from other members. Since students are still lack in experience and not able to consider a thing comprehensively, therefore, working in group would definitely help them to recognize the weakness of their projects and they would tend to have a better academic performance. Take myself as an example. I am a biology professional and my teachers often leaved some group tasks. Once a teacher required us to handle an experiment design, then my other three classmates and me formed a team. Each of us devised a blueprint and we gathered together to discuss the final draft. Surprisedly, we found that none of us conceived a total correct scheme, thus we pointed out the err and submitted an unblemished design. In this way, studying together will improve our working efficiency.
Furthermore, students can acquire motivation from other kids. People at a young age are often deficient in self-discipline, and the pressure from other group members can stimulate them to work hard. For instance, children are apt to take a rest frequently when they work alone, in contrast, they would be prone to study hard and figure out the puzzle, if they find other members in group are work hard. Therefore, with greater motivation will categorically boost our working productiveness.
In a nutshell, not only does working as a group eliminate our defects, but also enable us to fully utilize our potentials. As a result, I strongly endorse teachers should assign more tasks on which students must work together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s. Once a teacher required us to handle a experiment design, then my other three ...
^
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tal correct scheme, thus we pointed out the err and submitted a unblemished design. In ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 813, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...us we pointed out the err and submitted a unblemished design. In this way, studyi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10781671159 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81212564682 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544474393531 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9574569265 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.470588235 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318588384066 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103501226307 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106785180672 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215755735677 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093056010573 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.