By and large, education is very important for children owing to the fact that in this way, children will become ready for their future. By education, they will learn whatever is needed for the future life. In this regard, there is a controversy among people regarding the difficulty of educating children today in comparison to the past. A poplar belief in this regard is that educating is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because children spend so much time on cell phones, online games, and social networking Web sites, whereas the other group of people have a complete opposite point of view. Personally, I agree with the latter. In the ensuing lines, I am going to substantiate this idea through 2 reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that technology advancements, like the internet, has facilitated the way that children study. Children can have access to their textbook material whenever they want through the internet. In 50 years ago, children were tightly depended on schools and their teachers in order to learn something. If they missed their classes, they had to learn that academic subject by themselves, which was very difficult owing to the fact that they might have been encountered a plethora of problems. That being said, today, thanks to the advancements in technology, the learning process is not difficult for children anymore. They can connect to the internet via their cell phones and review all the textbook material whenever they want. Also, when they are going to the home or on the way to school, they can learn their lessons, because by using the internet, there is no limitation for children to educate. They can connect to internet wherever they want. Thus, educating children is much easier task today than it was in the past.
The second reason which deserves some words here is that television's programs have eased the way that children learn something today. Children can learn many things by watching cartoons. In the past, there was no television or if it was, it has a specific kind of program during the day, which was not appropriate for children. They were usually boring and children did not learn anything by watching them. So, TV programs were not helpful for children in order to learn them their textbook materials. However, today, every family has their own TV in their homes, which has a wide range of programs for all members of the family. Cartoons now play a vital role in educating children and they can learn alphabets before they go to the school. Also, they can learn more about animals, cities, and countries by watching cartoons. Hence, thanks to the television's programs, the educating of children are now much easier than the past.
To put it everything in a nutshell, the learning process now are not very difficult for children owing to the fact that internet has eased the education process. Children now are enabled to learn their textbook material whenever and wherever they want. Besides, TV programs, likes cartoons, have enabled children to learn alphabets and songs before going to school. Thus, unlike the past, educating children is not a more difficult task anymore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, kind of, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2642.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 535.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93831775701 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52248098067 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429906542056 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.869334801 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3571428571 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1071428571 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60714285714 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273191765146 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089979792361 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928069892963 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192993162905 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656980862308 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.