There is no giansaying that the great majority of people believe some famous rulers and conquerors as great leader during the history. Some people maintain that, people who have some natural characteristics are competent for being leader, while some others hold opposite view and they think for having a proper leadershilp characteristics, people should learn many things. From my perspective, leaders should learn many things, besides, they have some intrinsic features. The ensuing paragraphs will elaborate my points of view.
First exquisite point to be mentioned is that a successful leader should be a great manager. In better words, when a person is able to be a great leader that she learns some mangement issues for coping with problme, develment, new technology etcetera. Take, Bill gates the founder of microsoft as an example, there is no doubt that he is a great leader for youngesters and he has major effects on the young people the same aged as me. How could he be a leader? If we research, we will find people being more inteligent and educated that him. However, they could not be as prosper as him, because they could not make proper decision in right time. Bill gates was learned from his failurs how coped with his problems and finally he could establish his giant corporation. Therefore, leaders should learn many things about management.
Second point comes to my mind is that successful leaders have no option but learn about the people's or group memebrs' features. In other word, when a leader can thrive that she knows abundant information about the others. For example,Graet Alexander who could conquere many various territories, have many specific characteristics that helped to him, but there is no doubt that Aristotle had a crucial role for fostering him as a great leader.
Last but not least, there is no debate that communication have an undeniable role in modern societies and who can be a successful leader that know many things about the comunication. In other words, leaders who have enough experience and knowledge about the comunication are more likely to be a leader. Therefore, each political leader use a group of experts having enough knowledge about the comunication and affacting on people. For example, in presidental election in my country, Iran, persentative having more effcient communication with people, are able to attract voters and become president.
In conlcusion, contemplating all aforementioned paragraphs, leaders have some intrinsic charateristics that help to them for being leader, but there is no doubt these features are not adequate and they should learn many thing about the management, people's features and propre comunication with others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cessful leaders have no option but learn about the peoples or group memebrs featu...
^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Graet
...nformation about the others. For example,Graet Alexander who could conquere many vario...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le for fostering him as a great leader. Last but not least, there is no debate t...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
... are not adequate and they should learn many thing about the management, peoples features ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, no doubt, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22196796339 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86539611521 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489702517162 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0035383652 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.85 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130710180263 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053125486563 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312184793238 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085692492753 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229897243929 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.