Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, I firmly believe that children more appreciated their teachers in the past in comparison with today. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that there are a lot of attraction for children in these days compared to the past. In other words, children today tend to spend their time on different amusements technology provides for them. Hardly has any child been known that he/she does not have a game consol at home. Actually, all children have access to this kind of device. So, they prefer to spend time playing video game rather than doing their assignments. As a result, their enthusiasm for learning new things from their teachers decreases drastically. Therefore, children valued their teachers less than the past.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that technology provides children with a high efficient way of accessing different information. For example, computers and networks open up an access to a wide variety of information including some appealing results of scientific researches. Also, computers provide a lot of useful applications. These information and applications enable children to study the teaching material without the help of their teachers. In fact, they do not rely on their teachers as much as they were in the past to learn new things. Furthermore, with the advent of social networks today, children are able to make a lot of friends. Indeed, children now are less emotionally tied with their teachers In view of the fact that they have a lot of friends. So, children not only do not rely on their teachers for learning educational material, but also they are not emotionally tied with their teachers. These circumstances create a situation in which children do not appreciate their teachers as much as they did in that past.
Taking all aforementioned arguments into account leads us to the conclusion that teachers are less valued in the present days compared to the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'amusements'' or 'amusement's'?
Suggestion: amusements'; amusement's
...y tend to spend their time on different amusements technology provides for them. Hardly ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...example, computers and networks open up an access to a wide variety of information includ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'These informations'?
Suggestion: This information; These informations
...s provide a lot of useful applications. These information and applications enable children to stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16374269006 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82886236782 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2717642606 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9473684211 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151159200635 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563445031871 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603570136593 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104108077632 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167106532506 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.