Every cognizant person is convinced that our children are the fundamental pillars of our societies and the quality of their education is what we require to establish an outstanding future for next generations. As the result, we all are compelled that the teachers have the paramount role for our future's prosperity. Based on their key point position abundance of controversial arguments has been proposed by sociologists and teachers' community whether the teachers are valued less versus the past or not?. Admittedly, I hold the opinion that our teachers are more appreciated now and in the ensuing paragraphs the rationale behind this opinion will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, the fascinating progress of the human science and psychological basis of human's evolution during recent decades has clarified the enormous function of the schools and its instructors for growing a wholesome nation. As the matter of the fact, the allocation of million dollars for the research projects in universities and other researching corporation by the governments are the witness of raising the value of our schools and especially its teachers among the people. Besides, the remarkable part of the governments' educational budgets is specified for having adroit and resourceful mentors which is another reason that I consider as more appreciation for our teachers by providing more facilities for them to present their selves more effectual and ameliorate their knowledge.
Another compelling reason is that they are more engaged in our children's lives than the past which represent their noticeable and valuable character on our offspring's daily progress. For instance, my nephew is just turned to his sixish which is the first year of elementary school but he was so nervous and distraught at the beginning. As the result, his teacher offered and marvelous idea about the keeping his company at home, which was meant having thirty minutes video call by skype before his bedtime. The outcome was astonishing, he started to connect with his teacher after four days and afterward, he trusted to schools' environments very quickly. My point is no one no more can take our exceptional demand of the qualified teachers for granted if we want to have healthy offspring. Consequently, this special need elicit higher amount of appreciation for them.
All the mentioned arguments lead us to the conclusion that nowadays, our societies have deemed the teachers as one of the most valuable and efficacious factors for our children's upcoming prosperity and the conductive appreciation are that they more engaged to daily routines' of their students. Hence, they have eminent opportunities for developing their knowledge and skills by governments' budget.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'establishing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: establishing
...y of their education is what we require to establish an outstanding future for next generati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his opinion will be further elaborated. First and foremost, the fascinating prog...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 621, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'school'.
Suggestion: school
... four days and afterward, he trusted to schools environments very quickly. My point is ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38888888889 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93551741898 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55787037037 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7356997546 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.2 100.406767564 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13353606229 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488331348417 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381295598217 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912965395078 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153830524244 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.01818996416 126% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.