The reading and lecture both discuss the effect of the new regulations of handling and storing the coal ash. While the reading provides three claims to disagree with these regulations, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the article avers that the companies will have a concern about using very special liner to prevent the leaking into the ground. This is because they have to use these liner with every new landfill and every new pond. However, the professor argues this notion by saying that the government should make very strong regulation for the coal companies because the rules that we have is not sufficient. In addition, these companies use liner just at new landfill or with new pond only. So, many chemicals cause leaking and these materials can go through underground and contaminate the drinking water. As a result, we need very hard regulations to prevent these drawbacks.
In addition, the article mentions that some companies will stop buy these disposable products. This is because they will be afraid from these harmful materials. So, many coal's companies will be affected. On the other hand, the professor question this idea by pointing out that this concern will not stop consumers to buy these materials. For example, many companies still buy mercury over many years and they knew that mercury is very restricted product.
Finally, the reading mentions that the price of electricity will increased because the coal companies have concern about the cost of handling these materials. Nevertheless, the professor rejects this idea by explaining that this extra cost will be worth it. This is because the cost of electricity is like fifty billion dollars and the electricity pill will increased just one percent. So, it will be not too much to protect the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this liner' or 'these liners'?
Suggestion: this liner; these liners
...round. This is because they have to use these liner with every new landfill and every new p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...ions that the price of electricity will increased because the coal companies have concern...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 359, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...n dollars and the electricity pill will increased just one percent. So, it will be not to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, for example, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13043478261 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56669298649 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484949832776 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2701322213 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2352941176 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0255761198278 0.236089414692 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00984524005421 0.076458572812 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0161873653885 0.0737576698707 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0186880276624 0.150856017488 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122038344352 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.