Agreement or disagreement with the proposed statement needs a comprehensive study of the human psychology. Being satisfied in specific vacations is strictly interconnected with the psychological aspects of the humankind. Psychologists have conducted a thorough investigation of the meaning of the satisfaction in the human mind. This knowledge can be so helpful in determining the real happiness in the working hours. As far as I’m concerned, I think alternation of the specific works during a regular working time can benefits more the employees in every profession. The following paragraphs will aptly elucidate my perspective through three outstanding reasons.
First of all, The employees who change their working types are more powerful and happiness. However, some CEOs want their employees to do specific jobs and they should complete them in the proposed time. By the way of example, in Japan, the government has established a new set of regulations which forced the company holders to let their employees conduct their works in a shorter time. Such a logical rule can inject a huge energy to the cycle of industrial works and leads to the extremely powerful companies in Japan. So with the aid of changing works over the specific working hours, the employees do not be exhausted and can conduct their works more vigorously.
Equally significant is that the recent psychological researches indicate that the human brain becomes tired by doing redundant works. To illustrate it more, scientists explain their argument through a fair comparison between two sets of the worker which one of them works in a repeating manner but the others changing their works through the experiment time. Results show that the last group is more efficient than others and consequently the proposed argument has proved with that results.
The last but not the least reason is that the accuracy and efficiency of the works depend more on the workers status. If the employees do their works with low energy the outcoming results must be erroneous and the bosses cannot rely on them. For example, in China, one of the communication companies pushed their workers toward working hard all the day but after a while, the employees cannot barrel the harsh condition and they suicide. In conclusion, the suicide means that the worker doesn’t like their profession and so they don’t want to continue to live on the earth.
In brief, with proposed reasons, I can adopt a firm position that partitioning the working hours and devoting each part to a diverse work can benefit the employees and in the result, increases the efficiency of the companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...n conduct their works more vigorously. Equally significant is that the recent psycholo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...iciency of the works depend more on the workers status. If the employees do their works...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, so, while, for example, i think, in brief, in conclusion, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18691588785 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88346535167 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525700934579 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5582922379 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.842105263 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103835364011 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390681258289 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325091585782 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605480083048 0.150856017488 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373199314663 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.