TPO 43 . Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Always some mistakes will happen during the speeches. They either happen because of the lecturer misunderstanding about the subject, or they inadvertently say something which is not correct. There are various choices when people confront with this situation; they can interrupt the talk and correct the mistake, they can wait and talk to the speaker after the meeting, they can say nothing. In my way of thinking it is better to wait and talk to lecturer after the meeting because not only does the lecturer will be aware of the mistake, but also they will not be upset.
The first reason which should be stated here is that the person who makes the mistakes should be aware about that. Otherwise, they will repeat the mistake in other meetings and classes which will mislead the audience. Telling the happened mistake helps the teacher or lecturer to prevent it to happen again. For example, consider a teacher who is talking about the history of the Greek. He addresses the date of the conquests wrong. By telling his mistake, he will be aware of the mistake and will not do that in the next classes. While he will repeat it in all the classes again and again if he does not be awarded by the students.
The other point which deserves some point here is that talking after class will not harm the lecturer. Generally, it will upset people if we remind their mistake in a public place in front of other people, especially the lecturers who are talking about their specific area. Therefore, people are not supposed to interrupt the speech to correct a mistake, and it is better to be done after the meeting in a private place. By this way, the speaker will not be annoyed anymore. In addition, interrupting the speech make the lecturer to forgot his lines and do not be able to continue the talk as well. So, the audience should not cut the speech.
To summarize, it is better to remind mistakes, which is happened in a meeting or class by the lecturer, after the class in a private talk with that lecturer. In this way the speaker will understand their mistake, also they will not be annoyed by being scorned in front of the audience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
Always some mistakes will happen during the sp...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64473684211 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39414538676 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402631578947 0.524837075471 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6988073611 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8947368421 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132709302147 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484840592987 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362816534239 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907043802393 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182479113668 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.