In today's hectic world we live in, in which correcting the other person's mistakes is considered extremely important toward people's prosperity, a person would not be off the point to assume that being frank with people plays a key role to that end. However, whether students should correct their teachers' mistakes in class in front of the other students or not, is a contentious issue in this regard. One popular opinion regarding this issue states that a student should wait until the class is over and the other persons are gone then talk to the teacher and correct his or her mistakes. I personally count myself among the proponents of this idea and attempt to bring the most discernible reasons in the ensuing lines.
One imperative idea coming to mind at first is about time-limitation in classes. It is crystal clear that, teachers have a certain time in class to teach students large amount of study-materials. Also, telling teachers' mistakes during classes might be time-consuming. Thus, students should merely tell their teachers' mistakes after the class when class is over owing to the fact that if students corrected the teacher's mistakes right away in class, the teacher would not teach all the lessons which he planned. To illustrate my point, let me elaborate upon it by presenting an example. Consider a mathematics teacher embarking on teaching many lessons in class and he has just one last session of semester to teach all those lessons due to the dearth of time. in this circumstance, if that teacher made a plethora of mistakes because of his hurry and students corrected all those mistakes, it would take a myriad of time. Consequently, the teacher could not teach all the lessons.
Teachers' self-reliance is the second point which deserves some words here. It goes without saying that, mentioning and correcting the teachers' mistakes in front of all the students might have adversely affected teacher's self-esteem and decrease their confidence. According to Dr. Hasan Zohoor, a prominent and highly respected psychologist at the University of Tehran, pointing out people's mistakes in public have detrimental effects on their self-confidence. This provides further legitimacy and support for the idea that students should not correct the teachers' wrongs in front of other students. Therefore, the more teachers' mistakes students told in class, the more decrease teachers' self-reliance would be.
To put it briefly, considering the reasons that I gave, although ignoring teachers' mistakes or correcting them in front of class sometimes are not bad ideas, it would definitely be futile because of the time-limitation for classes as well as it would decrease the teachers' self-esteem. All in all, it is highly suggested a survey be conducted in order to assess the general opinion of the teachers and other psychology experts regarding such an issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 761, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...hose lessons due to the dearth of time. in this circumstance, if that teacher made...
^^
Line 7, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hology experts regarding such an issue.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, consequently, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17811158798 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85139197308 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497854077253 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.340831553 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5263157895 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138442555774 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521809509503 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369163374223 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949962605243 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162488299106 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.