In today's societies, the question of what is the best reaction when some person feel something wrong in the teachers or the meeting leaders lecture has become a controversial issue among people in many circles and camps. Different people have various types of responses to this topic based on their cultural, social, or even familial backgrounds. However, as far as I'm concerned, I believe that interrupting the teachers and correcting their mistakes in the aforementioned situation is the best thing that I can do for some reason that I elaborate them in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first thing immediately comes to mind is that correcting teachers can prevent other students misconceptions. In fact, students have a trust in their teachers' knowledge, so they think that all of their teacher's viewpoints are authentic. Accordingly, when a person interrupts the class and mentions the mistake, he helps their classmate to don't step in the wrong way. Let's make a brief explanation about that. I remember that when I was in high school, I recognized a big mistake in my mathematics teacher's teaching and corrected it. A little later, On the final exam, this correction helped my classmate to avoid from engaging in the wrong solution. Therefore, mentioning the teacher mistake right off the bat can have a plenty of advantages.
Another noteworthy aspect that should be mentioned is that this disturbing may provide a conversation among students and teachers. This interaction will be very beneficial for students. In other words, because students have a discussion about the subject, this subject will last for a longer time in student's mind. So, this interruption not only doesn't damage a student concentration but also provides a way for them to memorize it expeditiously. Let me shed a light on my point. According to the researches that were published in a well-known journal, scientist found that when people discuss some subject with other ones, this topic lasts more in their minds. Hence, teachers correction has a good result most of the time.
In conclusion, there are a plenty of reason to show that disturbing and correcting the mistake right away have numerous advantages. First, it prevents from students misunderstanding. Second, it gives an opportunity to the students to interact with their teachers. Consequently, It is essential that correct the teachers mistake immediately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...amilial backgrounds. However, as far as Im concerned, I believe that interrupting ...
^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he mistake, he helps their classmate to dont step in the wrong way. Lets make a brie...
^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...lassmate to dont step in the wrong way. Lets make a brief explanation about that. I ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ts mind. So, this interruption not only doesnt damage a student concentration but also...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22879177378 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03896708443 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560411311054 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2969022638 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8571428571 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5238095238 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52380952381 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157663689491 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04889334628 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055945551696 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110161306927 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539701809629 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.