TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa

How do we behave in each community is very crucial. Our behavior will be assessing carefully and we will be judge based on our reactions, especially in college or universities. It would be practically impossible for a student in university to have not heard something in class, from teachers or professors, which seems incorrect. Some students interrupt quickly as they find a chance to show themselves to class as a smart scholar and some of them say nothing even though they notice the mistake. In my opinion it is very important to speak and find whether the teacher said something wrong unintentionally or maybe I was thinking incorrectly about certain issue which leads me think this was, although it is more crucial to know, when is the right time to speak.

First off, distrusting a professor in middle of his or her talk during the class is very unpleasant for both students and the professor. Teacher of that class might arrange chain of information in his or her mind and interrupting the class, for a possible minor mistake, would not be wise. In university, we did not experience such a thing, although in my high school, when we were younger, in order to impress other students, there were students waited enthusiastically for that special moment to correct the lecturer. Despite their effort, nobody liked a show off.

Secondly and most importantly, we should wait until end of class or at least end of teacher, or leader, to tell them their mistake, because there are two possibilities. First, and most common type for me, is when we do not comprehend the subject fully and we assume wrongly that teacher said something incorrect. So, if we wait little more we understand the issue better and realize that we were wrong, not the teacher. Second, teachers' work is very hard and they work for several hours each day and there is a chance that they say something by mistake in the class and in this situation if students do not speak and interrupt, teacher will correct himself afterward.

In summary, correcting a teacher or instructor should not be our concern and we must focus on our advantages and our prestige in every community. Interrupting a teacher would not be wise, not only because it would be wrong attitude, but also because there is chance that we did not understand the subject at the time. How much it is essential to speak in order to realize everything correctly in every community, it is more important to know when to speak.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... better and realize that we were wrong, no the teacher. Second, teachers work is v...
^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...ork for several hours each day and they is chance that they say something by mista...
^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'those situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; those situations
...omething by mistake in the class and in those situation if do not speak and interrupt, teacher ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, at least, in summary, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80805687204 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75659647943 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509478672986 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7529941391 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.8125 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140070598068 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474092539289 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394090453789 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880081973431 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392447578029 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.