There are a lot of circumstances that we should be wise to handle them politely and correctly. One of these situations is when a teacher, for instance, says an inaccurate information. In my opinion, in this case, we should not mention this mistake directly and postpone the comments until the teacher finishes his speech. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will illustrate in the following essay.
First of all, teachers and meeting leaders could be feeling stressful during their speaking already. They might have an urgent issue in their life that causes them to be distracted a little bit, thus, interrupting them to edit what it could be unintentional error would increase their stress. So, the right behavior is to ask for a clarification after they finish their presentation. For example, my biology teacher in the high school at once time he used the category of mammals animals incorrectly. I asked him politely to illustrate this point after the class, surprisingly, he did not notice this mistake because he was distracted by his divorce. He thanked me, and he told me that he would edit this concept in the class at the next time.
Secondly, waiting for a person in charge to introduce his whole idea is a wise thinking, because there might be a hidden data that they would not reveal on it until the end of the speech. So, if someone interrupts the speaker that may interfere with their proposal.
For instance, my cousin told me about his unpleasant experience at one of his conference’s meeting with his business manager. He felt embarrassed because he rushed to correct one of the data surveys. Unfortunately, this data information was not related to his company, it was related to a competitive firm and that the topic what the business manager was going to discuss prior to my hasty cousin interfering.
To sum up, I strongly believe that we should not interrupt any speaker during his presentation if he says something untrue incidentally, but we should ask about it at the end of the speech privately, otherwise, that would make them feel stressful and nervous. In addition, we should wait until the end of the meeting to guarantee that we processed the whole idea to avoid, hasty, unnecessarily interfering.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ife that causes them to be distracted a little bit, thus, interrupting them to edit what i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...veal on it until the end of the speech. So, if someone interrupts the speaker that may...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, incidentally, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9057591623 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.882934744 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51832460733 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8998236558 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.235294118 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.082141787353 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307465168396 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256382228258 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0463570562033 0.150856017488 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267491607437 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.