The reading states that there are possible solutions to prevent the cane toad in Australia from reproducing and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer explains that these suggestions are not easy to apply and refutes each of the author's suggestions.
First of all, the reading claims that building a national fence could stop these creatures from spreading to new places. However, the professor opposes this point by saying this idea is not effective enough. She clarifies that these animals may find current streams, so this stream would carry them and their eggs to new areas easily.
Secondly, the reading mentions that massive volunteers could help to catch these animals and destroy their eggs. However, the lecturer counters this point by saying these volunteers may not have the appropriate knowledge to realize the difference between the toads' eggs and other native species' eggs like frogs.
Thirdly, the article suggests that scientists may develop a particular virus to attack the toads, as a result, the virus could prevent them from breeding.
However, the professor posits this idea by saying the virus could transport to other places and cause harmful effects to the toads in central America where these animals are essential to the ecosystem there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s are essential to the ecosystem there.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27317073171 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4040220116 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575609756098 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6710911856 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.111111111 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22516450144 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898242082431 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673068892028 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125018241875 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267151569824 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.