The reading states that salvage logging which is a method to help forests to recover after disasters has many advantages, and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer explains that this method has downsides for the long run and refutes each of the author' reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that the remains of dead trees after fires, for instance, would occupy a huge place, so removing these left over would help other trees to thrive. However, the lecturer opposes this idea by saying that the dead trees help the soil and provide available elements when they decay.
Secondly, the article mentions that the dead trees would be a suitable place for the insects to reproduce. in addition, these insects could be harmful to the healthy trees. So this method would protect trees. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that the insects are not necessarily to be harm. Furthermore, the dead trees are a habitat for many other species like birds.
Thirdly, the reading establishes that salvage logging provides economic profits by using the remains of wood in industries. In addition, this manner offers extra jobs. However, the professor counters this point by saying that these advantages do not last long, they are temporary. In addition, in this method, you may need to use vehicles and a helicopter to make the job done which they are expensive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ble place for the insects to reproduce. in addition, these insects could be harmfu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01731601732 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39582134054 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3682750825 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1538461538 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32642554895 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109992378821 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683757210732 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189823242394 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236053149985 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.