The reading states that maintain human existing on Venus could nearly impossible because of tough circumstances on this planet. The author of the reading provides three reasons to support this view. However, the lecturer explains that this mission could be challenging, but it might be established. The lecture refutes each of the reading reasons.
First of all, the article asserts that the pressure at Venus' surface is tremendous high. The spaceship would be destroyed if it landed there. However, the professor opposes this point by saying that this issue could be solved if they established a floating station. According to the professor, the atmospheric pressure above the surface would be lower compared to the, and almost equal to Earth at 15 kilometers high.
Secondly, the reading claims that there are no water or enough oxygen on Venus. However, the lecture counters this point by saying that they could provide these essential needs from the chemical substances in the Venus atmosphere.
Thirdly, the article mentions that the sunlight would not reach in a proper amount to the Venus because of the thick atmosphere. On the other hand, the lecturer posits this point by explaining that they could collect the reflected sunlight to generate the electricity that they need.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
... the surface would be lower compared to the, and almost equal to Earth at 15 kilomet...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 207.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2270531401 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58353404916 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6926990921 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1666666667 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293474490836 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109763494745 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581026500211 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17767282704 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385017250666 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.