The reading states that there are a lot of criticisms about the buzzing method which is a marketing manner and provides three reasons to support this view. However, the lecture explains that these claims are misleading and they give a negative impression about buzzers and refutes each of the author's criticisms.
First of all, the reading asserts that people think buzzers may be dishonest about their products because they get money to announce about them. However, the lecture explains that the buzzers have already used these products and they are decent about the information.
Secondly, the reading claims that people could be less judgemental about the objects are sold by buzzers. However, the lecture opposes this point by mentioning that in fact, consumers do not buy the product until buzzers respond to all the question about the quality of it.
Thirdly, the article states that the buzzers would make consumers skeptical about the people who they meet if they are buzzers or not. However, the lecture counters this point by saying that buzzers may make folks more trustful and open to people when they have a good experience with buzzers
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 190.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09473684211 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31887354447 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.5256241898 49.2860985944 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.0 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349357040604 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163274966276 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596335822415 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218314043856 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620582723267 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.