TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A proverb widely spread in the folk is that ‘to err is humane’, which means that the life of human beings is premised to unfold in a predictable circulation: people make a mistake; subsequently they correct the error and gain new insights into the world. Admittedly, it is inevitable for teachers or leaders to say something incorrect occasionally in a classroom or a meeting. when it comes to what actions students or employees can take to confront with the mistakes made by their superiors, I am inclined to the first solution that people should interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
To begin with, putting forward the confusion immediately might be the best choice to show respect to others. Due to the wrong cognition of politeness, a majority of people are concerned that their superiors would probably be uncomfortable to be questioned in a public place. Accordingly, after deliberateness and tradeoff, students or employees are like to choose to talk to the teacher or the leader privately or even keep silence about the mistake. Nevertheless, pointing out the mistake right away might be the optimal means of displaying the courteous behavior of a person in this situation. Only when people concentrate on the discussing topic of the speaker, can they discern the error in it.
Furthermore, this action is also conducive to acquiring a right understanding for the rest of audience. Some of the audience, without an ability of critical thinking or a specific amount of knowledge, could not find out the inaccuracy of the illustration by their own, and would undoubtedly believe what their superior has said is right, which is detrimental for their task response. Adversely, if one person could interrupt and correct the error instantly, the audience would have a right understanding of study or work as well as are more likely to be recognized for academic or vocational achievement, thereby the phenomenon of inefficiency can be largely alleviated.
Considering the points discussed above, I would like to reinforce my inclination that students or employees ought to point out the problem once they realize something wrong in a lecture or a meeting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...casionally in a classroom or a meeting. when it comes to what actions students or em...
^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...understanding for the rest of audience. Some of the audience, without an ability of critica...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15774647887 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06757071334 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569014084507 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8113887476 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.583333333 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5833333333 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158525092002 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619050790855 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696923015197 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936901632698 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649913760882 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.