tpo40
The author in the reading contends that impossible is maintaining a human presence on Venus, whereas the professor in the listening refutes the sustenance of human is possible.
To begin with, the author argues that the extremely high atmospheric pressure is likely to crush the landing spacecraft. However, the professor holds a different idea that establishing a station in the atmosphere rather than in the surface could solve the problem. A station floats at the 50 kilometers above the surface of Venus where the air pressure, lower than the surface, is equal to the normal pressure on the earth.
Moreover, the author deems that a constant supply of water and oxygen from Earth to Venus is impractical. On the country, the professor points out that water and oxygen can be produced from compounds. The compounds such as carbon dioxide or sulfuric gases filled in the atmosphere could be used in chemical reactions to make these living essentials.
Finally, the author claims that since the thick clouds reflect and block a large portion of sunlight, only very little light is available on the surface and human could hardly get sufficient electricity to operate their machine by using the scarce solar power. As a refutation, the professor states that the station can get enough light 50 kilometers above the surface. At that level, the cloud is not very thick so that the station have a relatively easy access to the sunlight. And the professor adds that the station can use both direct sunlight and reflected light to generate electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 439, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'relatively easy access'.
Suggestion: relatively easy access
...not very thick so that the station have a relatively easy access to the sunlight. And the professor adds...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03501945525 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65746506033 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548638132296 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2716319692 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.636363636 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372462077846 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125397960118 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04560407765 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193886565438 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358967053883 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.