I utterly agree with the statement. Nowadays in this era that life pressure has been decreased it an obligatory for youngsters to have the ability to think in long-term and be organized for what they are going to do in future with their lives in both personal and professional life. In what follows I will delve into some conspicuous reasons to substitute my point of view on this issue:
To begin with, having the tackle of your own life and conducting it discretionary in a way that you have planned is something that is efficacious for being successful and precarious. Thus when the destination is directly set, then first incentive and endeavor comes and progressively the initiation and innovations manifesters. For instance, employees would hire an applicant that has been thinking of getting the job for a long time and have been training themselves and have enough skill. However it does not mean that expecting everything to go by schedule otherwise it is going to end up failing. It is life and unexpected things might accrue in the route so contingencies should be watched out.
Another subtle point is that modern life has turned something like a race, it is highly competitive and for getting what you desire the most you need to devote and dedicate not only your self but also all your time and resources. But we must consider all the aspects of life by that I mean the ability to manage stuff simultaneously. Therefor for that high level of both mental and physical function, the role of planning is unignorable. Moreover, the time that has been assigned for work, family and leisure must be proportional and all adequate for intercepting possible issues in future. Say an individual would rather go out with someone who bequeaths enough time for their relationship and it is important as much as the future of the career of his/her.
To put in briefly, contemplating all the factors and reasons it is explicit that for fulfilling all the ambitious an individual might have, planning is irrevocable. Due to this not only younger generations but all the people must involve schematization in their diurnally, for progressing and improving in all perspectives of modern life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...us for being successful and precarious. Thus when the destination is directly set, t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ining themselves and have enough skill. However it does not mean that expecting everyth...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...equate for intercepting possible issues in future. Say an individual would rather go out ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, for instance, i mean, in brief, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92432432432 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91912411691 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545945945946 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.0013153564 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227545159378 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803678271965 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567016310245 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142821262982 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285143806529 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.