Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that people who maintain their olden friendship are happier than others who make many new friends but they do not try to keep and take care of this relationship. An old friendship provides a person with a sense of safety and self- confidence. So caring from long-term friendship has superiority to making new friends quickly. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that people who have the ability to find friends easily have more opportunity to be successful and happy people. However, I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make new friends easily.
First and foremost, old friends are the nice ones that always are the volunteer in critical situations. For example, two years ago, I was near to lost my house, because of the big failures in my business. All of my co-worker that I know them for a short time, but I count on them to assist me left me behind. In this bad condition, some of my high school close friends borrow money to me and help me to rise from the ashes.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that close friends are more trustworthy in getting a consultation. During a meeting with my old friends, we usually speak about our concern and family or job problems together. All of us attempt to honestly help each other to find a solution to the problem. These conversations remain among us as a mystery. Nevertheless, I cannot be confident enough with my new friends to share these issues with them.
Finally, yet importantly, make a lot of new friends never can supply the sense of belonging for people. In oppose of their brilliant ability to make new friends easily, they are so alone. They communicate with others to obtain some benefits, not for the beauty of friendship. Therefore, without a deep and long-term relationship, they do not experience a feeling of support and happiness provided by nice friends.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that keeping an olden friendship has priority to make a lot of new friends. Because you can count on old friends, be confident to them and feel there is someone who always supports you.
- TPO 41 - integrated writing 97
- People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. 73
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- tpo 47 70
- TPO 17 – task 2: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they are. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 637, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 674, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, honestly, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75675675676 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6897321106 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53316953317 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7831006509 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.35 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365134056309 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100259148749 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127774528072 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17720428074 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148165012398 0.0645574589148 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.