In today's societies, the question whether the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a time is more important for happiness than the ability to make new friend has become a controversial issue among people in many circles and camps. Different people have diverse types of responses to this topic based on their cultural, social, or even familial backgrounds. However, as far as I'm concerned, I believed that having few old friends have more influence in my happiness than making a new friend for some reasons that I elaborate them in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first thing immediately comes to mind is that when someone has an old relationship with some of his friends, they become close friends. A close friend is a reliable person who can help everyone to eliminate his mental problems as well as his monetary problems. In other words, people can reduce a lot of their life’s tensions with the help of their friends who have a long time relationship with him. Therefore, people become more delighted. let's make a brief explanation about that. According to the survey which was conducted in Tehran University in Iran, about 95 percent of participants believed that they only trusted to their old friend and if they had any problem, they will ask from close friends to help them.
Another noteworthy aspect that should be mentioned is that most of the people feel more comfortable when they are with their old friends. It means that they can easily speak about everything without any worries about the misconception of their friends. Accordingly, people feel more relax and also have much fun time along with their close friends. Thus, they absolutely feel happier in comparison with when they are with their new friends. Let me shed a light on my point. Based on the researches that were published in a well-known journal, Scientist found out that people rarely talk about their strange willing among their new friends because they thought that it can be bad effects on their new friend's mind.
Broadly speaking, There are a plenty of reasons to show that maintaining old friendship causes more happiness than making new friends. Not only old friends are more reliable in various situations but also people are more comfortable when they are with their close friends. Hence, It is essential that any person try to sustain his relation at least with few of his old friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
In todays societies, the question whether the ability to maintain friendships wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a time is more important fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...amilial backgrounds. However, as far as Im concerned, I believed that having few o...
^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lets
...herefore, people become more delighted. lets make a brief explanation about that. Ac...
^^^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...herefore, people become more delighted. lets make a brief explanation about that. Ac...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, at least, broadly speaking, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94390243902 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58686219928 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50243902439 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3394978816 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.611111111 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279080112615 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101069665554 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109785944241 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204583839329 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109513755322 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.