In today’s societies, the question of whether human activities make the Earth better place to live or damage it has become a controversial issue among people in many circles and camps. Different people have various types of responses to this topic based on their social, cultural, or even familial backgrounds. However, as far as I’m concerned, I believe that human programs help the Earth to become a better place for some reason that I elaborate them in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first thing comes to mind right off the bat is that people prohibit a lot of extinction that happened for diverse things. In fact, during previous centuries, a plenty of species had disappeared due to numerous of reasons such as soil erosion, fatal diseases, and forest fires. People improvements provide a lot of solution for many of these natural disasters. For example, nowadays there are a lot of warning apparatus that inform people about fires in jungles, So the firemen with the help of advanced equipment can put these fires off and save a life of many flora and fauna. Let me shed a light on my point. According to the statistics that were published by experts, the total number of trees that burned annually decrease remarkably over former decades. Therefore, human activities that concluded to the invention of useful instrument help the Earth.
Another noteworthy aspect that should be mentioned is that human activities make a lot of breakthrough in construction. So, the number of creates that have hurt by building the settlement have diminished. In other words, most of the creatures were died over past decades because of the building material produce abundant poisonous gases. But now, by doing a lot of researches the number of this gases decrease significantly. Let’s make a brief explanation about that. I remember that when I was conducting a survey as a high school student on the effect of poisonous gases on the city birds, I became astonished when I found out that about half of these birds' death is because of this factor. Thus, human improvement helps the creatures to live longer.
In conclusion, there are many reasons to show that human activities have had numerous advantages to the Earth. Not only it survives a lot of plants and animal form their natural catastrophes but also it reduces the human’s effect on the life of creatures. Consequently, it is imperative that any person considers the activities of humans as a positive effect for the Earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In today's societies, the question of whether human activities make the Earth better ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orate them in the following paragraphs. To begin with, the first thing comes to ...
^^^
Line 2, column 576, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun flora seems to be countable; consider using: 'many florae', 'many floras'.
Suggestion: many florae; many floras
... put these fires off and save a life of many flora and fauna. Let me shed a light on my po...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun breakthrough seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of breakthroughs'.
Suggestion: a lot of breakthroughs
...mentioned is that human activities make a lot of breakthrough in construction. So, the number of crea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...doing a lot of researches the number of this gases decrease significantly. Let'...
^^^^
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...en I found out that about half of these birds death is because of this factor. Thus, ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ans as a positive effect for the Earth.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00956937799 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81569495721 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1513440684 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.7 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251847986957 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751752139692 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861078073786 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16264177646 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817901737793 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.