In today’s societies, the question of whether teachers must prevent themselves from showing their political or social opinions to their students has become a controversial issue among people in many circles and camps. Different people have various types of responses to this topic based on their cultural, social, or even familial backgrounds. However, as far as I’m concerned, I believe that teacher should hides their points of view in social and political subject for some reasons that I elaborate them in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first thing immediately comes to mind is that students are easily influenced by their teachers. In fact, teachers are the heroes of their students. Accordingly, whatever teachers says in any field, their student thinks that it is completely true and they tried do follow it. Therefore, the students maybe enter into the wrong way that won’t have any return. Let’s make a brief explanation about that. Based on the researchers which was published in the well-known journals, scientist found out that the students who are in a range of seven to fifteen are affected by their teachers even more than their parents. Hence, the wrong guide from the teachers can cause a lot of damage in their students life.
Another noteworthy thing that should be mentioned is that when teachers often talk about their view point, the student was engaged on that. So, students restrict themselves to their teacher’s opinion and don’t seek for diverse viewpoint. Consequently, they lost their chance to become familiar to different points of view that can be more suitable to their characteristics. Let me shed a light of my point. According to the survey that was conducted in the Tehran University, most of the students state that they follow their teachers view point in a social and political issues. Hence, by hiding their opinion, teachers give an opportunity to their student to freely choose their path.
In conclusion, there are a plenty of reasons to show that teacher should not states their political opinions in the class. Not only they may guide their student to the wrong way but also they give their student’s chance in opting freely among miscellaneous viewpoints. Hence, it’s essential that teachers hide their tendencies in social and political subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In today's societies, the question of whether teachers must prevent themselves from s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
...reasons to show that teacher should not states their political opinions in the class. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24668435013 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78148806158 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533156498674 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8209610604 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.105263158 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267309914334 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100852068426 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506248144415 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192784745428 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00442583251099 0.0645574589148 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.