Some people think that government should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with?

In today’s societies, the question of it is better that government most dedicate a large amount of money whether to develop and buy computer technology or to provide basic needs of people has become a controversial issue among people in many circles and camps. Different people have various kinds of responses to this topic based on their social, cultural, or even familial backgrounds. However, as far ad I’m concerned, I believe that the government must spent their budget on basic needs of its people for some reasons that I elaborate them in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first thing comes to mind right off the bat is that governments have responsibility to provide the basic needs of their citizens. In fact, having basic need is a right of every person and it’s not additional things. Accordingly, when people of on country was deprived of basic needs, they can’t use properly the high technology devices. Therefore, if the government try to allocate their budget to buy a high-tech apparatus instead of providing basic need, they actually waste the money. Let’s make a brief explanation about that. I remember that when I was conducting a survey as a university student on the importance of basic needs on the daily life of people, I became surprised when I found out that about 80 percent of participation declared that whenever their basic needs were not accomplished, they can’t even concentrate on their courses appropriately.
Another noteworthy aspect that should be mentioned is that basic needs are very important for the other steps in the hierarchy of Maslow. To put it another way, Maslow said that providing the basic needs is a key element of countries improvement. So, when the government supply all of the rudimentary need of their citizens, these people can think about other thing such as continuing their education. As a result, the level of knowledge will augment in this country and it experience a lot of successes. Let me shed a light of my point. According to the researched that were published in the well-known journals, scientist determined that without preparation of basic needs, the country can’t step in the improvement path.
In conclusion, there are a plenty of reasons to show that dedicating more money to provide more basic needs have numerous advantages. Not only they are responsible toward their people but also they can help their country to become more prosperous. Hence, it is imperative that Government spend their money on the basic need.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ovement. So, when the government supply all of the rudimentary need of their citizens, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'experiences'?
Suggestion: experiences
...dge will augment in this country and it experience a lot of successes. Let me shed a light...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10551558753 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89417345976 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.677672099 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.277777778 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222078476131 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746481074098 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547589716716 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151900397795 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404614828234 0.0645574589148 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.