The fact that "ability to maintain friendship with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make new friends" has always been controversial and it will remain the same. Being human, we all have our own thought processes and we stick to that. So, here I will be stating my point of view about the aforesaid topic, i.e. friendship.
According to me, rather than making a huge number of superficial friends(mostly through social media like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.), making friends with a smaller number of people gives me more happiness. And, mostly this small friendship circle gets created in our initial childhood days, might be in school or our residential areas. So, as the days pass by, the bond gets stronger and our compatibility also matches better. They would be knowing more about you than some random friends, and you will also be more comfortable in discussing your feelings (sorrow or happiness) rather than to some random new friend.
I have a childhood friend named Moumita since school days and we are still good friends and going very strong. Though it is very rare that we hardly get any time to meet in person as we stay geographically apart, still we manage to take out some time to make calls or video chat and share talks about our day to day life and different experiences. It feels good to cherish our childhood days and what all activities we used to do together. I often share those experiences with my daughter and she also enjoys a lot. I hope our friendship stays strong till the last day and wish my daughter also finds some close and good friends like I have.
So, in conclusion, I would say that we should always look for quality friendship and not quantity friendship and maintain them strong till the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The fact that 'ability to maintain ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...pos;ability to maintain friendship with a small number of people over a long period of time is mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the aforesaid topic, i.e. friendship. According to me, rather than making...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...oresaid topic, i.e. friendship. According to me, rather than making a huge number of su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ibility also matches better. They would be knowing more about you than some random friends...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther than to some random new friend. I have a childhood friend named Moumita ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... close and good friends like I have. So, in conclusion, I would say that we s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74528301887 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6049070088 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5984227427 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.076923077 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254388093513 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866267326367 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121138225826 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162971348634 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982691047027 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.