Good friendship, in literary terms, is one of the most difficult possessions an individual may have. There are tons of consideration and commitments to be employed in ensuring a sustainable friendship. while some group of people may hod the view that making new friends is more important than maintaining our small old folks, I, on the other hand, strongly believe that keeping old friends are more invaluable due to the various reasons which I will elaborate here below.
The first obvious point is that old friendships builds trust and reliabilty. With the passage of time, people get along to know themselves and interact to discover their behaviors, interests and principles. This gains trust and confidence among these group of people. My personal experience will shed more light this idea. Over the four years of my college, I had a small of group of friends that we studied together, attended school social activities and exchanged various things in common. We grew to know, appreciate,encourage and love each other. This relationship transformed to a genuine and strong relationship that holds up to this very moment. Accordingly, this invariably built trust and reliability because of intimate relationship we developed.In contrary, having a huge of army of friends leaves you with no genuine friends as one does not concentrate to build a long lasting memorable friendship.
In addition,Old friends are more like a family. Certainly, old friends can be of our advocates in times of need. Based on the long term relationship, they carry our burdens just like theirs. I remember vividly when my father was at the point of death at the hospital and the surgeon required a huge some of money. I was despondent and thought all through if how to raise such significant amount of money. Whereas, I had a new friend who was highly influential, I knew it was improbable to approach and to request for such considerable amount of cash. This is as a result of no strong bond relationship. Finally, I resorted to to my old time folk who delivered me from the great troubles.
To wrap, it's irrefutable to argue that old friends are not more important to maintain than making new friends as it builds trust,genuine love and long lasting wholesome relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...d in ensuring a sustainable friendship. while some group of people may hod the view t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , encourage
...s in common. We grew to know, appreciate,encourage and love each other. This relationship ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 757, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...e of intimate relationship we developed.In contrary, having a huge of army of frie...
^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Old
...ing memorable friendship. In addition,Old friends are more like a family. Certain...
^^^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
... bond relationship. Finally, I resorted to to my old time folk who delivered me from ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o maintain than making new friends as it builds trust,genuine love and long lasti...
^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , genuine
...n making new friends as it builds trust,genuine love and long lasting wholesome relatio...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, if, may, so, whereas, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02925531915 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04181730239 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577127659574 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8105086749 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.55 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195240275323 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494236515591 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054214339589 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133119735617 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443798583499 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.