The lecturer disputes some arguments presented in the reading about the removal of “let it burn policy”. She contends that forest fires are part of the natural ecological system. Even though, they affected the famous National Yellow Park Stone, they are still important as they are create various opportunities in the ecosystem.
First and foremost, the reading argues that the forest fires instigated that huge damage of park trees and vegetation. As a result, left the park desolated with scorched and charred trees. On the other hand, the lecturer points out that the scorched land paved a way for the colonization of new plants, creating an opportunity for plants which could not have inhabited in such places in previous times to strive. She cited an example of seeds that required a high level of heat in other to surface on the natural ecosystem.
Secondly, the lecturer posits that while indeed there was a damage to the yellow stone, it fostered an ideal habitat for some animals such as rabbits or heirs which invariably provided other animals a source of food as they feed on the rabbits. Definitely, this created a strong food chain in the ecosystem. This is in direct contrast to the reading.
Finally, the lecturer states that tremendous damage which occurred in yellow stone park do not occur frequently even though it last long due to the inclement weather that propelled the intensity of the damage. She also mentioned that there is a high volume of tourist visiting the park after the great incident. This is contrary to the reading which claims that the outbreak of the forest fires has declined the rate of tourism to the National park
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...e, they are still important as they are create various opportunities in the ecosystem....
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
...urer posits that while indeed there was a damage to the yellow stone, it fostered an ide...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lasts'?
Suggestion: lasts
... do not occur frequently even though it last long due to the inclement weather that ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the rate of tourism to the National park
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, second, secondly, so, still, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96797153025 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52610388662 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544483985765 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4810308938 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.384615385 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250520029151 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845044651041 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595815506684 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145432643526 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038963900484 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.