TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

For decades, teachers have always been of great value to the growth of any society. They have contributed tremendously to the growth of abled knowledgeable citizens of a society. Although some people may argue that universities should not spend money on salaries of their professors, I, for one definitely disagrees with this opinion.

To begin with, professors are the backbone of any university and create an opportunity for a university to be recognized. Professors are highly educated people who impacts great knowledge to students. They educate and teach students how to become best in any field of study. Needless to say, not only do they teach students, they are also good counsellors. They encourage us in times of when the going gets tough in our academic life and supportively sees that we overcome those difficult moments. For instance, a university with a great number of highly reputable and intelligent professors will definitely become one of the best schools in the country and this obviously will draw tens of thousands of candidates seeking for admission in such institutions. Moreover, this generates a considerable amount of money for the university. Therefore, it is unreasonable that the salaries of professors should be debated .

In addition, professors should be appreciated for their great work. I absolutely believe that to whom much is given much is expected. If professors can be remunerated by paying them a substantial amount of salary, it will encourage them to be on track always and to deliver their best in educating the students. Appreciation of efforts instill in them the urge to carry out some great research works that will not only benefit them but also the university as a whole. This ultimately will have a positive impact on students as more knowledge will be gained and better ways to educate the students will be attained.

In summary, it is irrefutable to dismiss the idea that universities spending money on the salaries of professors will not be beneficial to the university, as the professors are the engine of schools and therefore their great works should be appreciated.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey have contributed tremendously to the growth of abled knowledgeable citizens o...
^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot only do they teach students, they are also good counsellors. They encourage us...
^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...demic life and supportively sees that we overcome those difficult moments. For ...
^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t we overcome those difficult moments. For instance, a university with a great ...
^^
Line 3, column 850, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of money for the university. Therefore, it is unreasonable that the salaries of ...
^^
Line 3, column 920, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...salaries of professors should be debated . In addition, professors should be ap...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, for instance, in addition, in summary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1613832853 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99898004197 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49855907781 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6795363489 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.352941176 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122927584167 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044995719342 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616572483235 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951302575411 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429902961993 0.0645574589148 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.