TPO 49- Independent writingDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.

It is a debate in psychology and social science that how people should establish their friendship and what is the best manner in this subject. Scientists who observe person's behavior claim that there are two style of characters. Some maintain friendship with a small number of persons deeply and some try to make new friends every day. I think this is more important for being happy to have few close beloved persons around us in comparison with finding new one and I explain my opinion in following.

First of all, trust is a vital factor for every individual in order to make connection with others and consequently make them calm with a joy of life. It is obviously accepted that time passing in a relationship increase the trustfulness in this relation so old friends could add more assurance than the fellows we have met recently. For example we share our secret with friends that we know many years however there may be many new opportunities with a lot of persons.

Secondly, knowledge in our relationship has a crucial effect on quality of our bending because this improves emotions with others and lead us to love each other. Researches indicate having a strong feeling to someone could raise our happiness in results of some chemical facts in our body. For instance in our modern life people feel less happy than past and thyy admit this because harshness of our lifestyles does not let us to meet our friend very much and we have relations in a shallow style with people.

In final words, being loyal to old friends and not replacing them with new ones teach us loyalty as a respectful value in our communities. This ability being faith to someone causes we would prosper in other environments like marriage life or professional career. For example a man who have some close friends for a long period of time has learnt to be with people repeatedly and this makes him able to be in a company for many years which makes him successful because companies promote just loyal employee as a high valued staff.

In conclusion, making good relationship and networks with our external environment is a necessary aspect to be happy in life but we should not neglect our strong old friendships too.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...aracters. Some maintain friendship with a small number of persons deeply and some try to make new...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a shallow style" with adverb for "shallow"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... friend very much and we have relations in a shallow style with people. In final words, being ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... who have some close friends for a long period of time has learnt to be with people repeatedly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.772845953 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61413124075 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553524804178 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.6513134848 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.571428571 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3571428571 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 5.45110844103 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274195960835 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098162832363 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649704375712 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158330007487 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580298693725 0.0645574589148 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.