There is no shortage of debates about laws with which public anticipates juveniles to behave with respect to everyone. I completely disagree with the idea that laws which are anticipated to behave according to them in public are strict. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
Initially granted, respecting people according to public rules is not a compulsion, but deference to others in a good way. It is clear that nobody can judge someone for his or her behavior to others, and although it is not compulsion, respecting people is necessity in society, a symbol of a good person. My own experience is a good example for this reason. Recently, I was going to cinema with my friend for entertainment. In the second station two old women entered the train and they stayed on foot. When I saw it, I stood up and suggested her to sit, but my friend not; thus, two old women rebuked him for his behavior, making him ashame of himself. In addition to this reason, rules do not expect young people to accord to rules in excess amount, but in moderate level, suggesting that rules are not so strict as young people thought. Therefore, because people are not exposed to follow rules very strictly, these laws are not severe.
Secondly, if public rules were so strict, it would be considered at the same level with government laws. It is obvious that in some countries public rules are almost government laws for people, demanding them to strictly obey rules. For example, in Iran, society rules, which are also morality rules, are pondered main laws of the country. There, people can be dispatched due to some law breaks by courts, which are only can expose young people to be rebuked or judged by others in my country. Furthermore, in a nation in which strict rules exist, there should be almost a perfect society; all young people respect others, no one disturbs someone else, and so on. Hence, rules are not considered as government laws, thus juveniles are not obliged to obey these rules in excess amount.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that public laws are not severe, requiring them to closely follow society rules.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76329787234 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.522228869 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505319148936 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7006996939 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215923926196 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723769566286 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543178390523 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128292523082 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029941069862 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.