The history courses always have been important fields of study, especially for university students. I am of the conviction that students should not be forced to study history at university. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following passage.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that providing throughout history courses for universities is not financially beneficial. It is axiomatic that when students are not interested in a specific subject, they do not learn anything from that. Also, since universities should pay money to hire new history teachers, especially such universities that do not relate to the historical sciences, lots of expenses emerge, while no significant outcome is obtained. For example, in my undergraduate program, our university required us to pass history classes. Consequently, unless there was no history teacher in our university, they hired three teachers for that purpose. On the other hand, my friend's academy school, which was not as famous as ours, invested this money to increase grants for research projects. The result was interesting, my friend university preceded our university's ranking. This shows that investing in history classes not only is not useful but contributes to financial losses.
Another noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that studying history is a waste of time for not a history major student. In fact, students can take some extracurricular classes and obtain some valuable skills instead of learning somethings which might never be helpful for them. My own experience is compelling evidence of this concept. In our university, we can take history classes as elective courses. I preferred to take a software class instead of a history class. As a result, I learned how to work with software which was related to my background. After I graduated, I could find a very suitable job because of this skill. I would not have gotten that job if I had picked the history class instead of that software workshop. This shows that students can spend their time on more crucial matters than history to help them in their future careers.
To put it in briefly, all enumerate reasons lead us to the conclusion that university students should not be forced to pass the history courses because not only it would be economically useless, but also is a waste of time for students who can learn a useful skill in the same time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, if, so, while, for example, i feel, in brief, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07518796992 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84732075947 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531328320802 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.322023668 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0382073182676 0.236089414692 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0135626027083 0.076458572812 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234815114557 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0301991035808 0.150856017488 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01295067956 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.